Engaging Learners with New Strategies and Tools

In the NYC school system it is illegal for students to use cell phones, pdas, or any unapproved devices in the schools. Cell phones have the capability to access information and are, basically, little computers that can be used as learning tools. How trustworthy they are in the hands of pubescent students to be used for educational purposes while in school has yet to be determined.

As the use of technology as a learning tool becomes more accepted in the school system (and that may take decades) the use of technology devices other than computers and whiteboards, some yet to be invented (Dick Tracy’s wristwatch is almost a reality), may find a place. Students are using camcorders, cameras, and other forms of video equipment as learning tools to tell their own stories and to provide a visual record of their experiences. Finding the funding to provide such resources is a challenge.

I believe that a variety of technology learning tools will find their way into the school system to enhance the education of students, but I do not believe that it will be led by school administrations or even the government. They are still laboring under the illusion that if students can test better in reading and math, then all is well in the land of Oz and that the old, comfortable, “tried and true” mode of educating students will work with a tweek here and a twist there. The real, substantive change will come from private sources that realize that we cannot compete unless our students are given the technological tools and the guidance to use them that will make a difference.


References
Anderson, T. (2008). Teaching in an online learning context. In Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.) (pp. 343-365). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.

Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environment. College Teaching, 54(1), 190-193. Retrieved October 25, 2009, from Academic Search Premier database.

Siemens, G. (2007). Curatorial learning. [Podcast]. Learn Online.Retrieved October 25, 2009, from http://learnonline.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/10-minute-lecture-george-siemens-curatorial-teaching/

Presentation Outline

The following outline will be used in developing the video presentation for Educ 8842: Principles of Distance Education, Walden University:

· Description of topic: Virtual Worlds
· History of virtual worlds
· Significance of games vs social virtual worlds
· Potential uses and impact of virtual worlds on education, business, and government
· Role of educators in promoting virtual world technology
· Projected global implications of virtual worlds as technology advances

Assessing Collaborative Efforts

It would seem to be extremely difficult for an instructor to assess the contributions made by individual learners to a collaborative learning community. There are students who have a great facility for writing and can very eloquently and convincingly expound on a topic without saying much. There are students who have phenomenal ideas that should be shared with the community but due to some lack of confidence or even a lack of writing ability are not able to convey those ideas in a manner that allows a significant contribution to be heard. Unless the instructor “knows” the student, and in an online community this may not be the case, the assessment process will not be “fair and equitable.” The use of rubrics is a means of leveling the field, assessing a student’s participation, and assisting in the assessment process, but not substantively if the student’s contributions do not translate into what may subjectively seem adequate as defined by that rubric.

According to Siemens (2008a) a concrete application for measuring participation, such as the wiki system, where the amount of time allocated to online access and number of posts contributed, may be the consummate assessment tool at present. The feedback system, where students respond to posts of fellow students, is a means of assessing contributions, but it is not a tool on which instructors should base a great deal of reliance.

In the world of online courses, students may not like networking or collaborating, goodness knows I don’t, but upon signing up for the program students know that such collaboration is part of the journey. Until some alternative is provided by the university, what students may or may not want is irrelevant. Although the instructor may try to make students more “comfortable” in the collaborative environment, it is not his role to provide those alternatives. The instructor needs to keep open communication with students, building trust and a connectiveness (Siemens, 2008b) that promotes the online community environment, and allow students to develop a sense of cohesiveness within the community. It should not impact the instructor’s assessment plan, whatever that may be.

Siemens (2008b) observed that some very bright students, used to competing and “winning,” are reluctant to participate in the collaborative environment, yet may have the most to contribute. The blogging process as part of the online course allows students to make individual contributions while still being involved in the collaborative process. Cohort members of the community must just continue to give feedback and allow all to feel comfortable in their community.


References
Siemens, G. (2008a). Assessment of collaborative learning. [Vodcast]. Baltimore MD: Laureate Education, Inc. Retrieved October 13, 2009, from http://sylvan.live.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=3649020&Survey=1&47=4839415&ClientNodeID=984645&coursenav=1&bhcp=1Siemens, G. (2008b). Learning Communities. [Vodcast]. Baltimore MD: Laureate Education, Inc. Retrieved October 13, 2009, from

Elements of Distance Education Diffusion

Siemens (2008) called the acceptance of distance education by business, academia, and government and their combined “interaction to provide and to equip students for this online environment” the triple-helix model of education. I think that academia was a little slower in acceptance of distance education than either business or government had been. I recall using conference calls in the 70s to train employees who were off-site of the company headquarters, who could not get into the office for whatever reason, and having it considered an alternative to the inconvenience of traveling to the office.

Now, however, distance education seems to be boldly seeping into the academic world, albeit slowly, but will, at some point, be considered the alternative to face-to-face education, without the stigma of being considered “less,” providing less of a quality education, less prestigious on the resume, or less of a benefit to the learner population. Learners will become more comfortable with the online learning environment (Siemens, 2008) and as a result will force acceptance as they request more courses be taken online.

I agree with each of the views Siemens (2008) espoused about global diversity, communication, and collaborative interaction. In focusing on one of these elements, at present, communications is increasing to the point where it may be interfering with everyday life. There are so many opportunities for individuals to communicate with each other -- texting, skyping, twittering, blogging, emailing, faxing -- that it seems almost strange to communicate solely by making phone calls. For someone to claim that they could not get in touch with someone else, with the myriad of options available, seems an impossibilty. And this is only the tip of the iceberg of communications. Someone out there is conceiving of another form of communications that will be achieved and we will wonder what life was like before it existed.

Reference
Siemens, G. (2008). The future of distance education. [Vodcast]. Baltimore MD: Laureate Education, Inc.